My Ordinary Extraordinary Life (Chapter 9) Down... LINK
To achieve an extraordinary result you must choose what matters most and give it all the time it demands. This requires getting extremely out of balance in relation to all other work issues, with only infrequent counterbalancing to address them.
My Ordinary Extraordinary Life (Chapter 9) Down...
Achieving extraordinary results through time blocking requires three commitments. First, you must adopt the mindset of someone seeking mastery. Second, you must continually seek the very best ways of doing things. And last, you must be willing to be held accountable to doing everything you can to achieve your ONE Thing.
When seeking classification as a person of extraordinary ability, a petitioner files an Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers (Form I-140) on behalf of a noncitizen (who may be the petitioner) with evidence demonstrating that the beneficiary is eligible.
The person has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, which has been demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim, and whose achievements have been recognized in the field through extensive documentation.
A petition filed on behalf of a person with extraordinary ability does not need to be supported by a job offer; therefore, anyone can file the petition on behalf of the person, including the noncitizen who may file as a self-petitioner. The person must still demonstrate, however, that he or she intends to continue work in the area of his or her extraordinary ability and that his or her work will substantially benefit the United States in the future.
When filing a petition for a person with extraordinary ability, the petitioner must submit evidence that the person has sustained national or international acclaim and that the person's achievements have been recognized in the field of expertise. In determining whether the beneficiary has enjoyed "sustained" national or international acclaim, the officer should consider that such acclaim must be maintained. However, the term sustained does not imply an age limit on the beneficiary. A beneficiary may be very young or early in his or her career and still be able to show sustained acclaim. There is also no definitive time frame on what constitutes sustained.
The evidence provided in support of the petition need not specifically use the words "extraordinary." Rather, the material should be such that it is readily apparent that the person's contributions to the field are qualifying. Also, although some of the regulatory language relating to evidence occasionally uses plurals, it is entirely possible that the presentation of a single piece of evidence in a specific evidentiary category may be sufficient.
However, objectively meeting the regulatory criteria in the first step alone does not establish that the person in fact meets the requirements for classification as a person with extraordinary ability.
Meeting the minimum requirement of providing required initial evidence does not, in itself, establish that the person in fact meets the requirements for extraordinary ability classification. As part of the final merits determination, the quality of the evidence should also be considered, such as whether the judging responsibilities were internal and whether the scholarly articles (if inherent to the occupation) are cited by others in the field.
An officer cannot predetermine the kind of evidence he or she thinks the person should be able to submit and deny the petition if that particular type of evidence (whether one of the prescribed types or comparable evidence) is absent. For example, an officer may think that if a person is extraordinary, there should be published articles about the person and his or her work. However, an officer cannot deny the petition because no published articles were submitted, so long as the petitioner has submitted evidence meeting the three qualifying criteria that demonstrates the person is in fact extraordinary. Approval or denial of a petition must be based on the type and quality of evidence submitted rather than assumptions about the failure to address different criteria.
While a person may be stronger in one particular evidentiary area than in others, the overall impression should be that he or she is extraordinary. If the officer determines that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate eligibility, the officer should not merely make general assertions regarding this failure. Rather, the officer must articulate the specific reasons as to why the officer concludes that the petitioner has not demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the person has extraordinary ability. As with all adjudications, if an officer believes that the facts stated in the petition are not true, and can articulate why in the denial, then the officer denies the petition and explains the reasons in the written denial.
If requesting additional evidence is appropriate, officers should provide some explanation of the deficiencies in the evidence already submitted and, if possible, examples of persuasive evidence that the petitioner might provide to corroborate the statements made in the petition. If a petitioner has submitted evidence that he or she believes establishes the person's extraordinary ability, merely restating the evidentiary requirements or stating that the evidence submitted is insufficient does not clarify to the petitioner how to overcome the deficiencies.
An officer might encounter a case where a petition is filed on behalf of a person who was previously classified as an O-1 nonimmigrant with extraordinary ability, or extraordinary achievement in the case of persons in the motion picture and television industry. Though the prior approval of an O-1 petition may be a relevant consideration in adjudicating an immigrant petition for a person with extraordinary ability, it is not determinative. Eligibility as an O-1 nonimmigrant does not automatically establish eligibility for immigrant extraordinary ability classification.
Each petition is separate and independent and must be adjudicated on its own merits, under the corresponding statutory and regulatory provisions. Moreover, the O-1 nonimmigrant classification has different definitions and standards for persons in the arts and the motion picture and television industry when compared to the definition and standard set forth for the immigrant with extraordinary ability.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is updating the USCIS Policy Manual to align existing guidance on certain first preference immigrants with a recent Policy Manual update relating to nonimmigrants of extraordinary ability.
Gentrification is changing cities across America, forcing people from neighborhoods they have long called home. Call them the displaced. Now those priced out of the Bay Area are looking for a better life in an unlikely place. American Suburb follows this migration to one California town along the Delta, 45 miles from San Francisco. But is this once sleepy suburb ready for them? KQED's Devin Katayama and Sandhya Dirks explore that question, taking us into the ordinary spaces of suburban life to find extraordinary stories about race, poverty and belonging.
Overview: Nothing To Envy uses the experiences of six North Korean defectors to address the extremes and difficulties of everyday life under the totalitarian regimes of Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il. There are compelling glimpses into the extraordinary challenges of everyday life that get magnified by systemic socio-economic failure as the country is engulfed by famine and unemployment. Constructive insights are derived into the consuming power of propaganda, the role of guilt in daily life, and the paralyzing fear of falling farther out of favor. Society is scripted by radios and televisions that only transmit government messages and the daily homage given to portraits of the father and son. Ultimately, it is through courage, deception, persistence and luck that some are able to escape the ravages of North Korean tyranny only to discover that additional challenging consequences await them and their families.
259. To refrain mutually from injury, from violence, fromexploitation, and put one's will on a par with that of others:this may result in a certain rough sense in good conduct amongindividuals when the necessary conditions are given (namely, theactual similarity of the individuals in amount of force anddegree of worth, and their co-relation within one organization).As soon, however, as one wished to take this principle moregenerally, and if possible even as the FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OFSOCIETY, it would immediately disclose what it really is--namely,a Will to the DENIAL of life, a principle of dissolution anddecay. Here one must think profoundly to the very basis andresist all sentimental weakness: life itself is ESSENTIALLYappropriation, injury, conquest of the strange and weak,suppression, severity, obtrusion of peculiar forms,incorporation, and at the least, putting it mildest,exploitation;--but why should one for ever use precisely thesewords on which for ages a disparaging purpose has been stamped?Even the organization within which, as was previously supposed,the individuals treat each other as equal--it takes place inevery healthy aristocracy--must itself, if it be a living and nota dying organization, do all that towards other bodies, which theindividuals within it refrain from doing to each other it willhave to be the incarnated Will to Power, it will endeavour togrow, to gain ground, attract to itself and acquire ascendancy--not owing to any morality or immorality, but because it LIVES,and because life IS precisely Will to Power. On no point,however, is the ordinary consciousness of Europeans moreunwilling to be corrected than on this matter, people now raveeverywhere, even under the guise of science, about comingconditions of society in which "the exploiting character" is tobe absent--that sounds to my ears as if they promised to invent amode of life which should refrain from all organic functions."Exploitation" does not belong to a depraved, or imperfect andprimitive society it belongs to the nature of the living being asa primary organic function, it is a consequence of the intrinsicWill to Power, which is precisely the Will to Life--Granting thatas a theory this is a novelty--as a reality it is the FUNDAMENTALFACT of all history let us be so far honest towards ourselves! 041b061a72